Communists in the USA

Look what's happening in California!

SEIU... Obama's biggest supporters...

God Help Us!

Att00001

A May Day rally in Los Angeles, co-sponsored by the SEIU and various communist groups, as well as other unions, reflected yet another step in the normalization of self-identified communist and socialist ideologies in the Obama era. Not only did the SEIU help to organize the rally in conjunction with communists, they marched side-by-side with communists, while union members carried communist flags, communists carried union signs, and altogether there was no real way to tell the two apart.

The communists freely and proudly declare their affiliation. And the SEIU has no problem marching arm-in-arm with them.

Att00002

"Smash Capitalism" is a slogan the SEIU apparently endorses - or at least doesn't mind marching behind. In case you think the SEIU is some peripheral out-of-the-mainstream organization:

The SEIU devoted $28 million to Obama's campaign, making the SEIU "the organization that spent the most to help Barack Obama get elected president." Furthermore, who is Obama's favorite White House guest and one of his closest confidants? The individual who has visited the Obama White House the most:

SEIU President Andy Stern, who has visited 53 times.

Obama is closely linked with the SEIU. The SEIU is closely linked with communists.

You do the math.

Att00003

Did I say communists? Sorry, I meant Communists (with a capital "C"). Note how the Communists that day (like the women on the right in this photo) carried solid red flags

symbolizing their ideology. Keep that in mind as you view the next photo...

Att00004

One of the SEIU leaders picked up a Communist flag and led a contingent of rank-and-file SEIU members. Everyone was OK with that!

Att00005

The way you can identify the SEIU members in all these pictures: They're the ones in purple t-shirts carrying blue-and-yellow signs.

Att00006

So, as you can see, the communists and the union members intermingled as the march progressed. In case you were wondering what the SEIU was saying during all of this, here's a video of the SEIU chanting "Legalization or REVOLUTION!" Clear enough?

Att00007

And, it wasn't just the SEIU at the march - other "normal" unions like the AFL-CIO were on hand as well.  There were plenty of teachers' unions attending too, and they brought along many of their public school students for some good old-fashioned communist indoctrination.

Att00008

Most of the  idiots in the US who walk around with 'Che' buttons or 'Che' shirts do so simply because they foolishly think he's "cool." These hardcore communists carry his image not because he's "cool," but because he was one of the most radical revolutionaries who ever lived. Right up there with Lenin, apparently.

In order to have a more "civil dialogue" with their political opponents, the marchers made a puppet of a demonic Statue of Liberty aligned with the "Tea Bag Party."

Att00011

OK, I guess Hitler comparisons are off the table for now - too many people have called it taboo. So what's second best? The Devil!

Att00012

Tell me the honest truth: If the Tea Party had marched in a rally behind a banner held up by fascists or neo-Nazis, don't you think it would have been national news? But the nation's biggest Obama-supporting political organization marched behind banners like these, and not a peep about it in the media. Hmmmm....

Att00013

Until recently, the average American has regarded fascists and communists as equally noxious and equally malignant. As well they should have.   But the drive these days by the left side of the spectrum is to make communism and socialism somewhat less remarkable and more palatable.  For two years they angrily denied the Tea Party accusation that Obama's policies and supporters had a socialist bent. But in recent months, as the accusation had started to gain traction, the new leftist tactic has become nasty.


Att00010

Att00009

(download)

Roubo de R$ 700 milhões na Copa

Pasta das Cidades adultera documento e eleva em R$ 700 milhões projeto da Copa

Com aval do ministro, diretora de Mobilidade Urbana assina parecer forjado que recomenda projeto de Veículo Leve sobre Trilhos em Cuiabá e desbanca projeto original de linha rápida de ônibus

Quinta, 23 de Novembro de 2011, 23h59
Andre Lessa/AE - 25/08/11
Pasta das Cidades adultera documento e eleva em R$ 700 milhões projeto da Copa
Fraude na pasta teve o aval de Negromonte

BRASÍLIA - O Ministério das Cidades, com aval do ministro Mário Negromonte, aprovou uma fraude para respaldar tecnicamente um acordo político que mudou o projeto de infraestrutura da Copa do Mundo de 2014 em Cuiabá (MT). Documento forjado pela diretora de Mobilidade Urbana da pasta, com autorização do chefe de gabinete do ministro, Cássio Peixoto, adulterou o parecer técnico que vetava a mudança do projeto do governo de Mato Grosso de trocar a implantação de uma linha rápida de ônibus (BRT) pela construção de um Veículo Leve Sobre Trilhos (VLT).

Com a fraude, o Ministério das Cidades passou a respaldar a obra e seu custo subiu para R$ 1,2 bilhão, R$ 700 milhões a mais do que o projeto original. A mudança para o novo projeto foi publicada no dia 9 de novembro na nova Matriz de Responsabilidades da Copa do Mundo.

Para tanto, a equipe do ministro operou para derrubar o estudo interno de 16 páginas que alertava para os problemas de custo, dos prazos e da falta de estudos comparativos sobre as duas mobilidades de transporte.

O novo projeto de Cuiabá foi acertado pelo governo de Mato Grosso com o Palácio do Planalto. A estratégia para cumpri-lo foi inserir no processo documento a favor da proposta de R$ 1,2 bilhão. Numa tentativa de esconder a manobra, o "parecer técnico" favorável ficou com o mesmo número de páginas do parecer contrário e a mesma numeração oficial (nota 123/2011), e foi inserido a partir da folha 139 do processo, a página em que começava a primeira análise.

O analista técnico Higor Guerra foi quem assinou o parecer contrário. Ele era o representante do ministério nas reuniões em Cuiabá para tratar das obras de mobilidade urbana da Copa - a última, em 29 de junho. O parecer dele, do dia 8 de agosto, mostrava que os estudos do governo de Mato Grosso "não contemplaram uma exaustiva e profunda análise comparativa". Os prazos estipulados, alertou, "são extremamente exíguos". Além do mais, o BRT já estava com o financiamento equacionado.

Em reunião com assessores na última segunda-feira, no sexto andar do Ministério das Cidades, a diretora de Mobilidade Urbana, Luiza Vianna, disse que a ordem para mudar o parecer partiu de Cássio Peixoto, braço direito de Negromonte, e Guilherme Ramalho, coordenador-geral de Infraestrutura da Copa de 2014 do Ministério do Planejamento. "Ambos me telefonaram", disse. O Estado teve acesso a uma gravação da reunião.

No dia 6 de outubro, atendendo a essas ordens superiores, Luiza Vianna pediu para Higor Guerra alterar seu parecer. O funcionário negou-se a assinar o outro documento e pediu desligamento há duas semanas por escrito ao secretário Nacional de Transporte e da Mobilidade Urbana, Luiz Carlos Bueno de Lima.

Ao lado da nova gerente de projetos, Cristina Soja, a diretora Luiza Viana deflagrou a fraude. As duas assinaram o novo documento, aproveitando as primeiras páginas do documento anterior, mas alterando a conclusão. "Nós fizemos outra nota técnica, com o mesmo número sim, e mudamos o conteúdo", confessou Luiza Vianna na reunião de segunda-feira passada.

A diferença entre ambos os pareceres está na conclusão. Onde havia a expressão "não contemplaram" - uma referência do primeiro documento, de 8 de agosto, à falta de estudos para mudar o projeto -, no parecer técnico forjado ficou apenas com a palavra "contemplaram". "O estudo indica fatores mais favoráveis à implantação do VLT", diz o segundo documento, forjado.

Veja abaixo uma reprodução do estudo original:

Veja abaixo uma reprodução do documento alterado:

Acordo. A troca do BRT (Bus Rapid Transit), orçado em R$ 489 milhões e com financiamento contratado, pelo VLT, de R$ 1,2 bilhão, passou por uma negociação política entre o governador do Mato Grosso, Silval Barbosa (PMDB), o ministro Mário Negromonte, a ministra do Planejamento, Miriam Belchior, e o vice-presidente da República, Michel Temer, do mesmo partido do governador.

Tomada a decisão política, que esbarrava nos estudos técnicos do próprio governo federal, o Ministério das Cidades desencadeou a operação da fraude.

O projeto do BRT já havia sido assinado pelo governador anterior, o hoje senador Blairo Maggi (PR). O "sim" da União ao aumento de R$ 700 milhões foi dado por Miriam Belchior em reunião com Sinval Barbosa no dia 24 de agosto. A reunião foi intermediada por Temer. No dia 27 de outubro, Barbosa esteve no Planalto, onde assinou com Dilma o aval para captar os empréstimos. O financiamento sairá da Caixa Econômica Federal.

Communism is the way to the New World Order

Chart-communism
The study of Communism shows two factions which always fought for supremacy. The first is classical Marxism, which preaches violent takeover of governments, even at the cost of a bloodbath. This is the path espoused by Lenin, Castro and Mao. The more than 100 million deaths that they provoked make people cringe when they hear about it. However, there is a less known variant that was created right after Marx death, called Fabian Socialism, that preaches gradual, subtle revolution. This has been much more successful. In the same as with the devil, its greatest power lies in the fact that people doesn't believe it exists.

Communism started to change into what we call NWO when It became clear that Western democracies would not follow Russia in a violent takeover of the governments, in the 1920s. Proletarians were getting richer and were too conservative. Therefore, Commies simply changed their tactics, from Trotsky and Lenin's plans for bloody revolutions, to the "erosion from inside" plans of Italian Marxist author Antonio Gramsci. His strategy was to destroy the institutions that prevented the common man to accept the tyranny of Communism, such as family, Christianity, nationalism, etc., by infiltrating and supporting activists inside the media, universities, the Courts, music, movies; promoting the destruction of values.

This was followed by the "Critical Theory"  of the School of Frankfurt, funded by the Rockefeller Foundation. Keep capitalism working while we take power. Critical Theory is akin to the discourse of a drug dealer to a kid. The criminal says: “your father is not so good because he didn't give you a Nintendo last Christmas. Your mama is mean, because she makes you do your homework. Come with me” . They attacked in books, movies and music America, religion, fatherhood, modesty, masculinity, trying to prove they were all forces of evil, enslaving people. They had to destroy the past, to create a blank slab on where to write their commands.Their belief was that democracies would drop to their hands like rotten fruits. People would beg for revolution. Occupy Wall Street is just this same strategy used once more.

However (and this is a BIG however), Marxist economies proved to be total disasters, in theory (see Hayek) and practice (famine in China and Russia), in the 1950s. They had to step back and promote perestroika in Russia, "to be rich is glorious" philosophy in China, in order just to survive and not starve. Marxism as an economic theory is dead. Viva cultural Marxism ! The new cultural Marxists don't promise an economic paradise anymore: they are satisfied with econazism, political correctness, relativism and centralized control. No more workers' utopia, no economic equalitarianism. Just the big State.  The only country where Marxist economics is followed today is North Korea, where people die like flies of starvation. Even Cuba is privatizing. Obviously, when tyranny is achieved, any kind of political development is halted, because the situation is just too good for those who control power. Communism stops right there, and will never become anything else but a demagogic dictatorship. Utopia means "no-land".

Instead of communism, we have now total cultural and political control by the Party, and tamed, obedient capitalist buddy-buddies providing the wealth. This is the core of the New World Order. There is no way that Marx's path will ever be tried again. The means of production will stay in private hands, with the State controlling these hands. Perhaps it should be called socio-fascism.

Can you imagine China's government taking over all the businesses again from private hands, just to plunge the economy into the dark age ? Telling their Ferraris and Porsches good-bye? The most stupid part of Marx theory is his claim that after some time of a Dicatorship, the government would simply dissolve, along with police and the courts, because it wouldn't be necessary. People would magically change.

Obviously, the contrary happened: instead of generous, communist people became more selfish, alcohoolics, dealers in the black markets, blackmailing and spying each other. Just this month, we saw a baby girl who had been ran over by a car in China be left to die by dozens of passer-byes. Communism brings about the worst in people, never the best. However, this magical event, that goes contrary to all facts, is still the basic appeal of Marxism even today. It is because of this crazy promise that millions of deaths are accepted !

What we have now as fruits of Gramsci's work is not a Marxist revolution as he hoped, but a confused, valueless and passive society, which is more than ever attached to money. They are easy prey for the NWO tyrants, because people lost basic values worth fighting for. Gramsci would be amazed of how successful his plans proved to be, only to lead to a totally different outcome than what he was expecting. But we have to consider this: did the globalist bankers knew what would happen all along ?

A Smart Greek's Take on Greece Situation

fira_santorini_greece.jpg

If Greece were to exit the EURO it would be required to leave the EU. This could be disasterous and would create a precedent for other countries on the brink of default to do the same. The G20 have offered an ultimatum - You're either in or out! Tonight's vote in the Greek Parliament is due at 22:00 GMT. God help us.

The Greek people are disheartened, disappointed, angry, and their confidence in government and the socio-economic system is at an all-time low! Like yesterday I remember a friend telling me, “Life in Greece is great – no recession here!” This just when the UK had its first wake-up call to the recession in September 2008.

Today it’s all gone belly-up as the young and old are struggling and their future severely compromised. Many youths are considering leaving Greece. Others are totally embarrassed as their own nation has become a laughing stock and the black sheep of the EU and international markets. Business is floundering and many main street shops are a relic of the past. Pensioners and civil servants, like my father, were at the forefront of economic austerity (the most obvious targets), and the private sector is trembling and standing on loose ground as inflationary pressures and creative taxation are affecting their livelihood, too. Public services are on strike and protestors barricade entry to civil administrators from holding office hours bringing the economy to its knees.

What do the Greeks want? Well, if it was up to the majority on the streets, they would like the austerity measures eradicated and to go back to their “old” way of life; some to continue driving their Porsche Cayenne and others just wanting peace of mind, to receive a decent salary or pension, and live a humble way of life. 

Amidst the politic turmoil, the Greek people want someone to take responsibility for this mess (although arguably, they should all look into the mirror). They want someone in government to take control of the reins, stop manufacturing lies, and take the country through the eye of the storm with full transparency and no political agenda for personal gain. They want to know that their money will be safe without suffering devaluation. They want jobs, they want their bonus and salaries back to normal, and they want a future with more certainty and less taxation. Any shadow of hope would suffice.

With the additional austerity measures in mind, I would be very worried if it were up to the people to vote on the impromptu referendum that Mr. Papandreou initially suggested before receiving “electro shock treatment” from the G20 to get back to his senses. The austerity measures are part of the deal if Greece wants to receive the financial injection it needs to stay afloat. Without it, the basic functions of government, the economy, and social services would crumble leaving Greece to deal with a messy and tempestuous default.

If it’s any consolation, polls suggest that 70% of the population want Greece to stay in the EURO. Greeks recognize that reverting to the Drachma would plunge the country back to the Middle Ages overnight; they are a very proud people (for good or for worse) and have tasted the luxuries of a good life after entering the then EEC. I doubt they would want to live rubbing sticks and stones and chase after their food wearing just a fig leaf (if they know what’s good for them)! There are sound arguments for leaving the EURO. And yet, I am not sure that the Greek people fully comprehend the ramifications. To paraphrase one journalist, this cure could be worse than the disease.

As painful as this sounds, what the Greeks want is almost irrelevant because the choices are bitter either way. For now, they need to bite the bullet and take what cards they are dealt. The outcome for Greece and the Eurozone will depend on how the hand is played. Tonight’s vote will determine the political direction of Greece and hopefully place its fate in more capable hands.

Vatican Calls for 'Central World Bank' to Be Set Up

Palp
above: amazing resemblance

The Vatican called on Monday for the establishment of a "global public authority" and a "central world bank" to rule over financial institutions that have become outdated and often ineffective in dealing fairly with crises.

 A major document from the Vatican's Justice and Peace department should be music to the ears of the "Occupy Wall Street" demonstrators and similar movements around the world who have protested against the economic downturn.

 The 18-page document, "Towards Reforming the International Financial and Monetary Systems in the Context of a Global Public Authority," was at times very specific, calling, for example, for taxation measures on financial transactions.

(...continues on the link below)

In Italian, it says the same thing:

In 2009, he was saying the same thing:

The Bishop is an admirer of Soros.